Weapons of Mass Production: The Two Blokes Rebuilding the Arsenal of Democracy

In partnership with

200+ Claude Prompts Top Professionals Actually Use at Work

Claude can be your analyst, editor, and strategist.
But most professionals are using it to fix grammar.

These 200+ Claude prompts take it from grammar tool to your most powerful AI work assistant.

Sign up for Superhuman AI and get:

• 200+ ready-to-use Claude prompts to get real work done in minutes — researched, tested, and used by professionals at Google, Microsoft, and NASA

• Superhuman AI newsletter (4 min daily) so you keep learning new AI tools and skills to stay ahead in your career — the prompts are just the beginning

Claim your free prompts

The Two Blokes Rebuilding the Arsenal of Democracy

Ten million dollars of jet-powered revenge, up front, before demo day even ended. That's the number. $10M in actual, on-the-books revenue for a company that has existed for one batch — four months — and is shipping war drones off a production line a block from the beach in St. Petersburg, Florida, while some other cell churns the same airframes out of a 750 square meter shop in Warsaw.

Francisco Serra-Martins does not make software. He makes the thing the software flies. He ran a Ukrainian deep-strike drone company called Terminal Autonomy to $60M in revenue — customers including the U.S. Army, NATO, and the Ukrainian Armed Forces — and then, weeks ago, a Russian ballistic missile flattened his Kyiv factory. His family is in Ukraine. So he took the whole mess and aimed it somewhere new: Isengard Industries.

He calls it "Weapons of Mass Production." I read that sentence twice, then a third time, then poured a whiskey. The Arsenal of Democracy — the term FDR used to arm a world — rebuilt for drones. Not a handful of $50M super-MLRS tubes from a prime contractor. Thousands of precision systems, cheap, distributed, stamped out on allied soil by the thousands. 3,000 a month is the target.

Read that again. Three thousand. A month.

Six Systems. One Family. Zero GPS.

The lineup reads like the menu of a diner run by a man who's been to the war he's selling to. The AQV 114 Manhack, short-range anti-tank, a loitering munition. The AQ 101 Deleter, mid-range. The XQ 500 Jody, a jet-powered deep-strike bird. The AQ 1 Ace. And the crown jewel — the XQ 770, christened the Freedom Fighter, an unmanned combat aircraft the size of a real fighter's bad attitude, currently in flight test.

They fly without GPS. That's the part that made my spine go cold. A vertically integrated stack — AES-256 datalinks, visual navigation with AI terrain-matching, terminal guidance that holds lock in a jammed, GNSS-denied hellscape. The TJ-100 turbojet is built in-house, in-house propulsion, in-house autonomy, in-house targeting. One hundred percent. There is no supplier to bomb. That's the whole point.

Soldier is co-founder and CEO. His partner is James Tennant, an ex-Australian Army officer, a decade in private equity and private credit, who ran Balmoral, a defense investment bank, and is finishing a PhD in economic warfare. Economic. Warfare. Somewhere in the Valley a kid is pitching a smarter to-do list and these two men are teaching entire nations how to print their own deterrents.

Built in the War It Was Made For

Here's the part the brochure won't say: the systems are fielded today, in combat, against Russian forces, with Ukraine's 3rd Assault Brigade and the 28th Airborne, three systems at TRL 9 — qualified, used, bloodied. The engagement counts are withheld, which in this industry means "painfully high, and the customer doesn't want to spook the conference circuit." The U.S. Army has an IDIQ line on it, program details redacted like a state secret.

The demo-day pitch ended with a personal note so raw it almost worked as comedy: "With my family in Ukraine, for me, resilient defense manufacturing is personal." That's not a marketing line. That's a threat model.

"If we were doing everything we do, would we choose to do it again from zero?"

— Garry Tan, via TheFoundersPack

Here's the thing about that question. Everyone in a 2026 YC batch, shuffling up to a microphone to pitch a CRUD app for accountants, is being asked to justify starting from zero with a straight face. Isengard doesn't have that problem. Francisco already did it — from zero, in Ukraine, in the middle of an artillery duel — and his reward was watching his factory get turned back into a parking lot by a cruise missile. The zero-based answer, for a man like that, is: yes, and this time it's armored and it's everywhere.

The Pack Behind the War Machine

Now the part of this that should actually give you chills, because it's the part that generalizes. Isengard isn't a drone company. Read the mission again: "the means for allied nations to make precision-strike and counter-drone systems on their own soil." This is the pack thesis — three wolves, common assets, amplified by technology — rebuilt for the grim reality of industrial warfare. The shared asset isn't land or code; it's sovereign manufacturing capacity, spread across a coalition. The pack isn't a Slack channel; it's a distributed arsenal. When one factory gets flattened by a missile, the one in Warsaw keeps the line running.

This is what Form Your Own Pack is actually about — not friendly newsletters and customer loyalty programs, but the brutal logic that a pack of distributed capability outlives any single castle. Ten million in revenue and a $350M pipeline is what cooperation looks like when the stakes are ballistic.

Same shape as any pack: a small, terrifyingly competent team betting everything on a shared vision and shared infrastructure. If you ever wanted to see a founder test that thesis with a real flight program, this is it. And if you want to explore what a small team can do when they point relentless autonomy at a single hard problem — the same shape as Genflick, where a tiny crew ships AI filmmaking tools that do the work of a studio — give Genflick a run. Free to try. Zero missiles required.

Arsenal or Bust

The YC partner behind the deal is Gustaf Alstromer. The deal landed in Summer 2026, S26, though you suspect these two men were running this company in their heads before a financial crisis most of the batch was still in grade school for.

I've profiled a lot of startups. Brackets. Todo lists. A fork that tells at you. Then you find two former soldiers teaching nations to build their own deterrents in the back of a YC batch, and all the "AI agent for X" pitches suddenly sound like children arguing over whose toy is more honest.

They call it the Arsenal of Democracy. FDR would recognize the ambition. He'd probably just blink at the price tag, and the fact that it fits in the trunk, and that it comes back to the shop in Warsaw for a software update after it has already made its point.

The future used to be watching tech scale a social graph. The new future — and Isengard is shoving it through the bootloader — is a pack of allied nations, each one a weapon foundry, learning that deterrence is measured in units delivered.

There's a missile heading for your factory. You can't out-muscle it. You can only make sure it's not the only factory.

Founders:

Francisco Serra-Martins — Co-founder & CEO. Ex-Australian Army combat engineer. Ex-Terminal Autonomy CEO ($60M revenue, U.S. Army/NATO/Ukraine). Forbes 30 Under 30, YC alum.   X | LinkedIn

James Tennant — Co-founder. Ex-Australian Army officer. Ran Balmoral, a defense investment bank. PhD, economic warfare & hybrid threats.   LinkedIn

Links: YC Profile | Website | LinkedIn Company | Partner: Gustaf Alstromer